<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review &#8211; Casio G-Shock G7500-1V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review - Casio G-Shock G7500-1V &#171; Casio G Shock Watch Information</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/comment-page-1/#comment-162892</link>
		<dc:creator>Review - Casio G-Shock G7500-1V &#171; Casio G Shock Watch Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/#comment-162892</guid>
		<description>[...] Thank this info to http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thank this info to <a href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nishan</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/comment-page-1/#comment-95000</link>
		<dc:creator>nishan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/#comment-95000</guid>
		<description>this is available in my country, and i love it . im going to buy a Gshock this month but i wont go for this because i m obsessed with the Mudman G9000 ! A real son of a gun . and has better useful features than this ( Forget the vibration and the telememo witch i can manage better using my pda)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is available in my country, and i love it . im going to buy a Gshock this month but i wont go for this because i m obsessed with the Mudman G9000 ! A real son of a gun . and has better useful features than this ( Forget the vibration and the telememo witch i can manage better using my pda)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/comment-page-1/#comment-63383</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/#comment-63383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to buy a new watch my Casio Databank died.  I&#039;m debating between this G-shock and a Timex USB data-link. Are there any reviews for it.  
I heard the original data-link wasnt all that great with the blinking screen thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to buy a new watch my Casio Databank died.  I&#8217;m debating between this G-shock and a Timex USB data-link. Are there any reviews for it.<br />
I heard the original data-link wasnt all that great with the blinking screen thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark wouters</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/comment-page-1/#comment-47257</link>
		<dc:creator>mark wouters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/#comment-47257</guid>
		<description>casio GW-002E-1VER is a superb little number,it has countdown and all,no vibration ,but who needs that!
002E Everytime for me,Its solar ant atomic,LOVE-IT !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>casio GW-002E-1VER is a superb little number,it has countdown and all,no vibration ,but who needs that!<br />
002E Everytime for me,Its solar ant atomic,LOVE-IT !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/comment-page-1/#comment-7136</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/01/24/review-casio-g-shock-g7500-1v/#comment-7136</guid>
		<description>As much as I love these kinds of technical watches, none seem to have all of the features I desire. Like, this watch has everything, but I love atomic timekeeping and solar powered watches. Other G-shocks have those features, but leave out things like the countdown timer or vibration alarm. I guess we&#039;ll have to wait a few years until we can  get a true full package watch.

Anyway, nice review. G-shocks all the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I love these kinds of technical watches, none seem to have all of the features I desire. Like, this watch has everything, but I love atomic timekeeping and solar powered watches. Other G-shocks have those features, but leave out things like the countdown timer or vibration alarm. I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait a few years until we can  get a true full package watch.</p>
<p>Anyway, nice review. G-shocks all the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

