<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review &#8211; Bell &amp; Ross BR 01-92</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick sword</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-269245</link>
		<dc:creator>nick sword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-269245</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-158502&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mark &lt;/a&gt; Never,  ever, rely on Invicta customer service. Great bang for the buck, but, like so many others, there are no Invicta factories; so good luck when you need service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-158502" rel="nofollow">@Mark </a> Never,  ever, rely on Invicta customer service. Great bang for the buck, but, like so many others, there are no Invicta factories; so good luck when you need service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick sword</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-269244</link>
		<dc:creator>nick sword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-269244</guid>
		<description>Nothing about this watch or many other, status watches, substantiates the ridiculous prices people are dumb enough to pay for them. What a bunch of nerds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about this watch or many other, status watches, substantiates the ridiculous prices people are dumb enough to pay for them. What a bunch of nerds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-268446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-268446</guid>
		<description>Just be careful with the more complicated models. They are great-looking watches, no question, but I have had two BR01-94 chronographs in the last 2 months (Dec 09 and Jan 10) and both have been returned with the same fault: a chrono second hand that works loose and falls off its axis so that it hits the minute hand and eventually stops the watch mechanism altogether. I was very disappointed as I really liked the watch design. I have given up on them and gone back to Jaeger. More expensive, but the difference in quality is obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just be careful with the more complicated models. They are great-looking watches, no question, but I have had two BR01-94 chronographs in the last 2 months (Dec 09 and Jan 10) and both have been returned with the same fault: a chrono second hand that works loose and falls off its axis so that it hits the minute hand and eventually stops the watch mechanism altogether. I was very disappointed as I really liked the watch design. I have given up on them and gone back to Jaeger. More expensive, but the difference in quality is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Jansen ng</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-266533</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Jansen ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-266533</guid>
		<description>Did anybody know, that Bell &amp; Ross&#039;s
early beginings were at Sinn, in Germany
Also the first B&amp;R movements were from
Sinn.
I&#039;d love a Bell and Ross, they are a bit overpriced
for what they are. Don&#039;t get me wrong they
are lovely watches. They need to justify their
price for the BR 01-95.
The movement may be a adjusted and
improved but, if as one of the people
stated that it&#039;s movement is that basic and
found even as simple as Swatch watches.
Would that put people off.
I did me!
I have a Omega and Audemars Piguet,
the later purchased second hand.
I would still love a B &amp; R to my collection
but which one??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anybody know, that Bell &amp; Ross&#8217;s<br />
early beginings were at Sinn, in Germany<br />
Also the first B&amp;R movements were from<br />
Sinn.<br />
I&#8217;d love a Bell and Ross, they are a bit overpriced<br />
for what they are. Don&#8217;t get me wrong they<br />
are lovely watches. They need to justify their<br />
price for the BR 01-95.<br />
The movement may be a adjusted and<br />
improved but, if as one of the people<br />
stated that it&#8217;s movement is that basic and<br />
found even as simple as Swatch watches.<br />
Would that put people off.<br />
I did me!<br />
I have a Omega and Audemars Piguet,<br />
the later purchased second hand.<br />
I would still love a B &amp; R to my collection<br />
but which one??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpkm</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-255828</link>
		<dc:creator>cpkm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-255828</guid>
		<description>To access the crown mechanism&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124421&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@K.Rankin  &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To access the crown mechanism<a href="#comment-124421" rel="nofollow">@K.Rankin  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Watches: 10 Sexy Carbonized Wrist Watches</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-220648</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Watches: 10 Sexy Carbonized Wrist Watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-220648</guid>
		<description>[...] Bell &amp; Ross BE 01-92 Heritage Watch is big. Actually, it’s huge. Like most of the Swiss watchmaker’s designs, the 46mm-diameter timepiece is inspired by aircraft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bell &amp; Ross BE 01-92 Heritage Watch is big. Actually, it’s huge. Like most of the Swiss watchmaker’s designs, the 46mm-diameter timepiece is inspired by aircraft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-201711</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-201711</guid>
		<description>If you are looking for quality and style without having to morgage your house, check out Christopher Ward of London.  Excellent quality watches, using the same swiss made movements as the &quot;names&quot;.  I have two.

www.christopherward.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for quality and style without having to morgage your house, check out Christopher Ward of London.  Excellent quality watches, using the same swiss made movements as the &#8220;names&#8221;.  I have two.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.christopherward.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.christopherward.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-158502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-158502</guid>
		<description>I just ordered the Invicta Corduba Chronograph with the carbon fiber dial.The style is very similar to the B&amp;R 01-94.It is a quartz watch with a w.r.to 660 feet.When it gets here I`ll have a  more informed opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered the Invicta Corduba Chronograph with the carbon fiber dial.The style is very similar to the B&amp;R 01-94.It is a quartz watch with a w.r.to 660 feet.When it gets here I`ll have a  more informed opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-124421</link>
		<dc:creator>K.Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-124421</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
       could any tell me what purpose the screw on the back of the case of the Bell &amp; ross is for ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
       could any tell me what purpose the screw on the back of the case of the Bell &amp; ross is for ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/comment-page-1/#comment-101514</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/index.php/2006/02/02/review-bell-ross-br-01-92/#comment-101514</guid>
		<description>The demand for bell&amp;ross watches is at the moment so high, that even here in switzerland it&#039;s hard to get one.
After beeing dissapointed by my Luminor from Panerai (poor quality, to many defects) I sold it and I&#039;m now waiting for almost six weeks for a br 03 92.
I do agree, that the cost of it is massive but you can be sure, that it&#039;s worth! The quality is superb and soon B&amp;R watches will be as atractive, as Panerai was before!
Can&#039;t wait to have it...

Juan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The demand for bell&amp;ross watches is at the moment so high, that even here in switzerland it&#8217;s hard to get one.<br />
After beeing dissapointed by my Luminor from Panerai (poor quality, to many defects) I sold it and I&#8217;m now waiting for almost six weeks for a br 03 92.<br />
I do agree, that the cost of it is massive but you can be sure, that it&#8217;s worth! The quality is superb and soon B&amp;R watches will be as atractive, as Panerai was before!<br />
Can&#8217;t wait to have it&#8230;</p>
<p>Juan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
