Home > Divers, Reviews, WWR Exclusive > Review: Alpha GMT Diver

Review: Alpha GMT Diver

alphawrist.jpg

Unmitigated crap, thy name is Alpha. I don’t mean to be harsh, but I’m spitting mad right now staring at the hunk of garbage called the Alpha GMT Diver. Alpha is an eBay brand famous for their “replica” watches which apparently include the entire Rolex line, a few sassy Omega-alikes, and even an Anonimo-alike. They are almost all mechanical automatics, which is impressive, but they are little more than a ham-handed effort at selling branded fakes.


I know I always say I’d love China to start making their own brands, but this is not what I was looking for. I was open-minded. In my travails with eBay brands I’ve rarely been amazed but I’ve never been so disappointed. What is the issue? Well, this is a GMT watch. It has a large red hand indicated 24-hour time. It is set independently of the other hands and the bezel offers even a third time zone option. “But John,” you’re saying, “that sounds super! It’s like a three-timezone watch for less than c-note! And it comes with a gimpy little price tag that looks like a lump of wax!”

alphaside.jpgYes, friends, it does come with a little lump of plastic shaped like a dollop of wax. But that’s not all! This watch has a fatal, and horrible, flaw. The time zone setting “sweeps” across the face when you try to change it. That’s right. Not only can you set a second time zone, you can feasibly set time zones in parallel universes or at the center of a black hole. Let’s see… if it’s 4am here in Tokyo, it must be 1:28 in Mtzplkia! Luckily, that’s one time zone from Burblefrox, which makes it 2:28 over there. Thank you, Alpha!

Normal GMT movements snap from hour to hour. If it is 10:30 in New York and you want to set it a few time zones ahead, the GMT hand moves swiftly from 10:30 to 11:30 instead of moving like the hour hand – 10:31, 10:32, etc. This little feature, found on most major GMT movements, is the way things are supposed to work. Instead, this Chinese-made movement half-asses things and has the GMT hand slip forward and back with giddy abandon, rendering it absolutely useless.

alphadoll.jpgThe design is quite ham-handed – it’s clearly a fake Rolex redone. The markings at the bottom of the face, where the Chinese pirates usually write “Swis Mad!!!!” reads CK and HK, which is apparently secret code for “shitty movement.” The date cyclops is there, surely enough, and the date looks like it was applied using a stamp made of a halved potato. Not so readable, let’s just say.

alphaface.jpg
Another clincher? The clasp is patterned to look like the bracelet. Someone in the Alpha/MillionSmart factory thought this would be a nice touch, I suppose, but all it did was make me much angrier.

alphaback.jpgI didn’t want to be so angry, but I am. I cannot recommend these watches – even Sandoz, another well-known far East/eBay brand, makes a better Submariner-alike and for GMT grab a Seiko 6117 or another used, classic piece. Want to go really classy? Grab the amazing D.Freemont Sapphire Diver. But please, for the love of all that is good and holy, avoid this watch.

Quality: 1/5
Style: 1/5
Overall: 1/5

-John Biggs

Related posts:

  1. Review – D.Freemont Sapphire Power Reserve Diver
  2. Review – Tauchmeister 1937 Diver
  3. Review: Zlatoust Diver
  4. Review: Trias Automatic Massive Diver
  5. Review – Zinom
Categories: Divers, Reviews, WWR Exclusive Tags:
  • Andrew

    I bought an Alpha Explorer about 18 months back. Great bracelet but of the watch fell off due to a poor spring bar. The hands and face were slightly misaligned. The watch gained 40 secs a day for the first week. After about 6 weeks it settled in to a very accurate +20 seconds per week. The lume was very bright and lasted a reasonable amount of time. Fit and finish overall were very good. Probably 90% of a Rolex for 2% of the price.

    However you can get a Citizen or Seiko for a bit more than the Alpha price. Personally I much prefer my Seiko 007 to a Rolex look alike.

  • Quant

    I purchased the very same alpha GMT (before reading this review, thankfully).

    So far, I am very pleased. From a distance of more than a few cm, it does not look distinguishably different from the watch which serves as its inspiration. One area where it does differ from the Rolex, however, is accuracy. The alpha is better! It has averaged +1.5/s day.

    Not bad for something that cost (including shipping) less than 1/10th the price of the sales tax on its equivalent.

  • http://www.izoom.hu IZOOM

    Well guys evrybody knows for ROLEX you have to pay the name….. I live in Hungary and a ROlex costs 6000 dollar here. You can imagine how money people actually wearing a real ones. no one gives a shit. We dont pay 6000 for 5 letter….

  • James in MN

    HOW CAN YOU COMPARE A $40 KNOCKOFF TO A $5000 PRECISION INSTRUMENT? YOU CAN’T!!!!!

    Comparisson to a $40 Armitron from Walmart would be more feasable. The only thing you get for $40 at a retail store is a battery operated watch with “fake” non functioning features!

    I took a chance on an alpha gmt off ebay and am very pleased. It cost me 41.00, 16.00 of it was shipping from HK to the US. So for 41.00, I got a watch that..

    1. Is autowinding
    2. Water resistant
    3. Real GMT function
    4. Keeps accurate time
    5. Looks like a Rolex
    6. People compliment me on…

    If it lasts for a year, it was WELL WORTH THE MONEY!!!

    I am already looking to buy another…
    I think that if you like to collect watches just for fun, like I do, the Alpha is a good way to go!

  • dave holloway

    I’m wondering if anyone has had experience with alpha’s chronoghaphs?

  • GreenAlphaSubbie

    I purchased the Green Sub look-alike for about 40 bucks off of the website. I expected very little, but much to my surprise, the most beautiful watch arrived in the mail. I can’t believe how nice this watch looks, and I get comments on it daily. “OMG that’s the 50 year anniversary Submariner!” I always end up writing the Alpha web site down for people when they approach me. The only bad thing I can say is that such a beautiful watch should have come in a box. Mine came wrapped in newspaper which is okay, but if you are giving as a gift that’s kinda cheesy. I’ll buy the GMT next.

  • mrbrisvegas

    The reason some people hate inexpensive watches is simple. They hate the fact that a $40 watch looks and works like their $4000 watch. It is hard to feel superior if the guy on the street has something that looks just like your Rolex. IWC or Patek Phillipe but only costs the price of a case of beer.

    I have three multimillionaire businessmen friends who wear fake Rolexes because they think the ‘real deal’ is a total waste of money. With a real Rolex everyone assumes it is fake unless you are wearing an expensive suit. If you’re wearing an expensive suit they always assume a fake Rolex is real. BTW a Rolex Sub costs almost USD8000 in Australia.

    I have just bought a green dial Alpha Yachtmaster. It is keeping perfect time after 48 hours. That is as good as any automatic watch will get. I also own an Alpha Explorer. I wore it daily for about six months but the lack of a date was a nuisance. It runs about +2 sec/day. Neither watch has been regulated. I’m not worried if this Alpha only lasts two years. That works out to 5 cents a day depreciation. I can buy 10 new Alphas for the price of a single Rolex service.

    The Alpha has an excellent case and bracelet – similar quality to the real thing. The Alpha lume is good. The bezel moves a little too easily but that is the case with most watches. Waterproofing is poor but that hardly matters for a desk diver.

  • mrbrisvegas

    The Rolex Submariner is basically a copy of the original Blancpain ’50 Fathoms’diver. So it is probably OK for Alpha to copy Rolex.

  • Andrew A

    Just an update on my Alpha’s for anyone that is interested.
    The GMT is now a year and three months old and still keeps very good time. The glass is blemish free and the case and strap still excellent in finish and looks. The GMT movement works perfectly showing two time zones with ease. I wear this watch Monday through to Friday for work and my Orange Alpha on the weekend.
    My Orange Speedmaster lookalike is also performing without fault and its time keeping is almost as good as my Seiko titanium Sport100 Quartz in accuracy.
    I am not able to fault either watch.

  • http://greenstyle.com horny

    sm8Wgr df8v7ydfv83f61fvr58fdz

  • Flyingbezelguy

    Okay, bought this watch on-line for 39 USD. Green bezel submariner style. Had the watch for about three months.
    Yesterday I am riding in the car with my girl. She was driving thank God. I saw this green thing fly across the car. When I looked at my watch a few minutes later I saw that the bezel was gone! It was on the floor. I picked it up and looked at the back of it. There was paper covering the back of the bezel. I pulled it off and there was glue underneath. I stuck the bezel back on and it has stayed on all day so far.

  • Icantseewhy

    Stainless steel Analog/digital chronograph. Three alarm settings, dual time zones, hourly chime. Big fat glow in the dark hands and markers. Wal-mart or Target 70 bucks. Oh yeah and its fitted with a ten year battery.
    I can’t see why anyone would buy an alpha or any other shit ass watch. Just my opinion.

  • Icantseewhyupostedurshitasscomment

    Mr. Icantseewhy. Why even post such a comment? People are looking at the alpha brand because they like automatic watches and maybe the Rolex models are out of their price range. Who cares if you go to wal mart and get a timex or casio or whatever? If someone wants to appreciate a fine timepiece, I don’t know where in the hell you get off telling them to buy some wal mart or Target watch. Why are you even reading the post if your watch is so great and you love it so much?

  • wautersjr

    Well here are 2 write ups of one being disected…

    http://watchtalkworld.proboards84.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=watchg1&thread=1113&page=1

    and

    http://www.johnflynn.us/watches/movement_disassembly.php

    I think it’s very much a hit and mis brand. If you receive a good one, it’s great… If not, lesson learned IMO

  • Pingback: WristWatchReview.com » Inside the Alpha GMT Diver

  • Anonymous

    I don’t own an Alpha but it would seem to me that if you bought a cheap watch you should expect to receive a cheap watch. If you’re looking for a good look-a-like for a sub then try Debaufre. I think they are running $460.00 US new and I see them all the time used for $275.00 on WUS. It’s an excellent and I do mean excellent watch.

  • Hans

    Why bashing this great value brand? At least you’ll get a reliable stainless steel watch for little money. I think you’re just an asshole…

  • Adolf

    Sandoz is a Swiss brand.
    You are a bit ignorant, aren´t you?
    Or a liar that makes everything to prove his point.
    Go fuck yourself

  • Porkbarrelspendingsux

    I think this whole review was a HAM HANDED attempted attempt! YOU ASSHOLE!

  • dat

    This is one of the most useless watch reviews I have ever come across. The only good thing is the links to other, better reviews in people’s comments.

  • Ihateyou

    Hmmmm…buy a GMT watch for 40 bucks and then expect it to function the same exact way as a watch that costs thousands of dollars. Even better, write a review slamming it. You are a complete doucher.

  • ibutthumpedurmom2day

    You dumb ass. You don’t know shit. Alpha watches are nice and if you wear them everybody asks you if it’s a Rolex so go shove it up your moms big fat arse you fuckin faggot.

  • Jleahman

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I have had an Alpha in the past and for the money is a good value. Even other watch manufacturers cannot believe the price per product ratio. My Alpha manual wind movement was actually quite accurate. Accurate enough to compare with a Seiko. Alpha does have quality control issues but what do you expect for 60 bucks?!? Alpha beats a true work of crap, Swatch, anytime. In fact, numerous Swatches cost more then Alpha. The S in Swatch should stand for “shitty.”

  • AlphaMan

    Alpha are great watches. PERIOD!!! No 2 ways about it. What a useless review and great comeback from the true Alpha fans.

  • Stevo

    All, just want to thank you. This is one of the most diverse and funniest watch guy threads I’ve read in a while. Fun!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • AlphaMan

    Stevo, do you own Alpha watches or are you here to make new friends??? Stick to the review of Alpha watches and you can be my friend.

  • Andrew A

    Both my GMT and Orange swiss lookalikes are still going strong and remain my main watches of choice, 3 years on. Both still look great and nothing has fallen off. Best of all they keep time. I have used both on holiday for swimming with no issue. I just wanted to keep you Alpha fans and doubters informed. This debate will no doubt go on.

  • SCampbell

    I have an Alpha Sub that cost 38 bucks, I got it a few years ago before they raised the prices. It has a black face and blue bezel. I will tell you that I receive comments about how sharp the watch looks almost daily. I work in the IT industry and there are a lot of real and fake Rolexes abound. I’ll just be happy with my Alpha. It ran a little fast when I first got it but after wearing daily for about a week, it settled down and now keeps great time.

  • Robert

    The Alpha watch is pretty, but does have major problems preventing it from being a diver – lack of seals is the biggest one. But the watch is not what annoys me. What annoys me is the reviewer.

    Every review on this site is a blatant plug for his sponsors. I’m sorry that he’s cybersquatting the wristwatchreview.com domain name with this stupid crap.

  • collin

    its hard to take a guy who has a true distaste for the far east, and then makes a write up like he knows what hes talking about. “I dont mean to be harsh” my ass. Thats like saying “I like it when you poop on my cupcake and call it frosting.” Second, Don’t beat around the bush- Just come out and say that you hate that a 50USD watch with a tearoff of another that costs thousands more.

    lastly, I quote Chascomm from watchuseek forum.
    “However it does not function like a Rolex GMT Master-II i.e. on this watch, the 24 hour hand has a sweep adjustment from the middle crown position, while the 12 hour hand it sync’ed to the minute hand and set in the conventional way. IMO this constitutes a legitimate type of GMT function. Some enthusiasts however insist that a ‘true’ GMT must have the 24 hour hand sync’ed to the minutes, and the 12 hour hand independently settable by 1 hour steps only (bad luck if you live in Adelaide :-D ). By such a criteria, the old Rolex GMT Master-I and most vintage Seiko GMT are not ‘true’ GMT watches because both hour hands are permanently sync’ed”

    Do your homework son.

  • Grady Philpott

    “Another clincher? The clasp is patterned to look like the bracelet. Someone in the Alpha/MillionSmart factory thought this would be a nice touch, I suppose, but all it did was make me much angrier.”

    Have you ever looked at a Rolex bracelet?

    My Rolex Explorer has just such a band.

    Does that anger you, too?

  • Dave

    I happen to have both the genuine Rolex GMTII and an Alpha GMT. Given the price difference, I can say that I’d have to be more disappointed with the Rolex than the Alpha (Although I enjoy wearing both watches). I’m quite impressed with the Alpha, the band is actually superior to the real thing in that the links are not a folded sheet metal affair and has less play. The removable links are held together with screws like the real deal and the clasp has never let me down in the 2 years I’ve owned and worn it. Incidentally, I wear the Alpha when I’m going to be doing rougher things like mountain biking, construction projects, working in the yard etc where there is a greater likelihood it’ll be subjected to damage.

    As for the movement, True, it doesn’t feel or work quite like a Rolex, the 24 hour hand adjustment is continuous rather than notching on the hour, but that’s not a big deal. The date is a heck of a lot easier to adjust than the Rolex. The larger crown is a nice touch and the case is nicely finished. Magnification of the date window is not as good, but still makes it easier to see.

    For timekeeping, I must admit the Rolex is superior, with the Alpha about +10seconds per day, still respectable in my opinion.

    Water Resistance, no doubt the Rolex is the winner here, the Alpha doesn’t have a seal for the back cover (at least mine doesn’t have one), so this is a watch you might want to be careful with around water, certainly no diving or swimming with the Alpha.

    Lume – Not so good in that department, but I’ve found this isn’t an absolute necessity and is rarely a big consideration.

    Bottom line…. If you’re not willing to spend a lot more on the Rolex, I think the Alpha will provide a lot of wearing enjoyment. I certainly enjoy wearing mine.

    So for the price, I think it’s a well constructed watch, keeps reasonable time, and in a few ways is superior to a Rolex.

    Hope this helps.

  • CPTBrock

    I bought an Alpha Sahir watch while stationed in Germany. Is this the same brand as the watch being reviewed here? Is it another brand? Anyway had the watch for 10+ plus years no scratches in crystal or case…. I did have to replace the strap pins three times. Watch keeps great time. I just now have to replace the battery.

  • Chrisbe

    $4000.00 vs $40.00
    Really?
    You’d probably scream at your 7 year old when he doesn’t complete a 40 yard pass in a Pop Warner game wondering the whole time why he can’t control a game like Peyton Manning.
    Next why don’t you compare a Hyundai Tiburon to a Bugatti Veyron Pur Sang? The Hyundai will get you to work and won’t leave you stranded but the damned thing won’t go 0-60 in 3 seconds right?
    Get a clue!!

  • harry

    after almost 4 years of this review, you still being fucked by the readers. haha. unfair review and your ratings are too much satan driven.

  • Iharpoonedtillicum

    This review is crap. i’d say Alpha watches are about the same as Invictas, they are about
    as close to looking like a Rolex as you are going to get for under 100 bucks. Most people don’t give two shits what kind of watch you wear. The only people who care what you have on your wrist are watch collectors. They watch movies just to pick out the watches. Hell, Now if you want to spend 400 dollars on a fake Rolex you can get one with a smooth eta movement and a sapphire crystal that will fool almost everybody. Alphas are great to wear as an everyday watch, they can take a beating. You will notice the first couple days the asian movement will run real fast, but if you wear it for about a week it will settle down and you will be fine. Plus if you lose it or break it you aren’t out 5000 bucks.

  • Gary

    Enjoyed reading all of this

  • Mary

    @dave holloway

    I have the Chronograph and I LOVE IT!!!

  • Andrew A

    Both my GMT and Orange swiss lookalikes are still going strong and remain my main watches of choice, STILL. They will keep ticking over night off of the wrist, they keep very good time and I cannot fault them. The GMT worked a treat for a trip to the USA and I used it swimming with no issue at all. I have checked the case backs on both my GMT and Orange and they both have a rubber seal as does the winders\ screwcrown. Alpha, great looks and build for the money. It was this awful review that got me buying Alpha watches. I don’t think that’s what John intended to happen.

  • Jim

    After reading this review and the subsequent comments, I, too, shall purchase an Alpha if for no other reason than to spite the douchebag who wrote the original review

  • curve

    @James in MN

    You can compare accurancy with accurancy and everything with everything. :D Why spending 6000$ for a watch you have to allways care about to not harm it in anyway, when you can have a similiar looking fo just 1% of the prize? It is just meeting the demands.

  • Tom Siznak

    Ok, because of this article, I purchased the Alpha submariner clone for about 64 dollars shipped. Watch LOOKS amazing, if you want everyone to think you have a Rolex, this is your watch. One of the screws in the links was loose, watch fell off first day(thankfully on the rug)The watch ran fast for about a week, then kept good time. A month in the bezel popped off. It actually still had the peel off tape on it. I removed it and put it back on. The Lume is bright for a minute, but doesn’t last. After one year of very gentle use, the crown is stripped. I don’t know where to get a replacement. If you want a Rolex Homage I would suggest Seiko, Citizen, Casio or Invicta. I feel that the Alphas are just slapped together with little or no QC. Anyone else had issues? Maybe I got a lemon.

  • Andrew A

    Over 4 years on both of my Alpha’s are still going strong. Nothing has fallen off and both movements are still 100% in full working order and still keeping very good time. Either you were unlucky or I have been lucky! I really like my Alpha’s. They are still my main watches I wear daily and at weekends. The crown on both mine will do up very tightly, the logo even lines up on both as well!

  • a0r0a7

    Where have all the comments gone????

  • Anonymous

    Hrm. They should have imported. Very weird.

  • Guest

    I can still see the comments when I disable javascript for this site,