<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swiss Army Watches: They&#8217;re Getting Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stories</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-109234</link>
		<dc:creator>stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/#comment-109234</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-90878</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/#comment-90878</guid>
		<description>I bought an outgoing Swiss Army mechanical self-winder with 25 jewel movement 8 years ago and can thoroughly recommend them. It keeps accurate within 30 seconds over 2 weeks on hot days and within 30 seconds over a couple of months during the winter. This is about the norm for a mechanical watch, only my Seiko Kinetic has bettered that with perfect time over 6 months. You want better - get a radio-controlled! Even better; get a life that doesn&#039;t depend on every second. I drove a bus for 15 years and needed good watches to keep the timetable. Now I&#039;m retired the Swiss Army has been dusted off and is used all the time, not just in my free time. The glass on the front and the back are scratch-free. The only fault is the wind-down winder doesn&#039;t anymore. Needs a service m&#039;thinks. And I replaced the original metal wristband with a leather one for comfort. It&#039;ll last me the rest of my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought an outgoing Swiss Army mechanical self-winder with 25 jewel movement 8 years ago and can thoroughly recommend them. It keeps accurate within 30 seconds over 2 weeks on hot days and within 30 seconds over a couple of months during the winter. This is about the norm for a mechanical watch, only my Seiko Kinetic has bettered that with perfect time over 6 months. You want better &#8211; get a radio-controlled! Even better; get a life that doesn&#8217;t depend on every second. I drove a bus for 15 years and needed good watches to keep the timetable. Now I&#8217;m retired the Swiss Army has been dusted off and is used all the time, not just in my free time. The glass on the front and the back are scratch-free. The only fault is the wind-down winder doesn&#8217;t anymore. Needs a service m&#8217;thinks. And I replaced the original metal wristband with a leather one for comfort. It&#8217;ll last me the rest of my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Agasino</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-82986</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Agasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/#comment-82986</guid>
		<description>I have a Swiss Army Officer&#039;s watch from 1994-95.  Aside from replacing the battery several times, it has never failed and keeps respectably accurate time.  I used to wear it during my retail days and it never scratched despite a little abuse (I have since worn it only during office work).  over a decade of use and still going strong!  I would recommend an over $300 SA watch to anyone looking for style and durability at an affordable price.  I currently have traded with my Dad for his Tag Heuer but I&#039;m thinking of trading back!  Money aside, the Swiss was less to worry about and has a more rugged appeal vs a Tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Swiss Army Officer&#8217;s watch from 1994-95.  Aside from replacing the battery several times, it has never failed and keeps respectably accurate time.  I used to wear it during my retail days and it never scratched despite a little abuse (I have since worn it only during office work).  over a decade of use and still going strong!  I would recommend an over $300 SA watch to anyone looking for style and durability at an affordable price.  I currently have traded with my Dad for his Tag Heuer but I&#8217;m thinking of trading back!  Money aside, the Swiss was less to worry about and has a more rugged appeal vs a Tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

