banner156×60_02.gifSerket WatchesMidwest Watches 130×90-copy.jpg
smalladblock.gifsmalladblock.gifsmalladblock.gif

June 27, 2008

Are big watches over?

Filed under: Fugly, Fun — John Biggs @ 1:15 pm

Chad the Watch Guy is reporting that he’s seeing a max out in big watches at 42mm which means even rappers and oligarchs won’t go around wearing pie plates on their wrists for much longer. I can handle a 50mm+ sports watch, but 42mm is a bit big for a mechanical, non? Your thoughts?

5 Responses to “Are big watches over?”

  1. Steve Mertz Says:

    I like the 42mm for those with big hands-but nothing looks more pathetic than a man with small hands wearing one of those behemoths!

  2. Panerai Luminor Watch | Watch Winders and Watch Accessories Says:

    [...] I commend his attention to physical activity but his wrist was way too small for the Panerai-it honestly looked like he was a kid wearing his fathers watch. The size of watches was top of mind for me becasue I had just read an post by John Biggs called Are Big Watches Over? [...]

  3. raj arjun Says:

    buy what you want best site number own emachineshop,com

  4. dave Says:

    it is a trend started by fashion houses and writers to do something different. I bet in 2yrs razor thin 80’s style watches will be back in. I think a watch looks good at around 42-44mm. I also think it is a cost issue, big watch big bracelet, more expensive to produce. I also hate the rose gold trend. It’s just fashion bs.

  5. Scott Tobias Says:

    I agree that its getting rather excessive. I almost gagged when I saw my first Bell & Ross “wrist clock”.

    At least I know what to get Shaq for his birthday.

Leave a Reply