<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hunting For A Tide Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-286504</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-286504</guid>
		<description>I got a G-Shock tide watch which was great except the tide display is very simple and does not work for complex tides in the Gulf of Mexico where there is no defined &quot;lunitidal interval&quot;. So the tide feature on the G-shock is pretty much useless to me, but since the Lodown is pre-programmed for more complex tides in the gulf and Caribbean, it seems like the only option for me if I want a tide watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a G-Shock tide watch which was great except the tide display is very simple and does not work for complex tides in the Gulf of Mexico where there is no defined &#8220;lunitidal interval&#8221;. So the tide feature on the G-shock is pretty much useless to me, but since the Lodown is pre-programmed for more complex tides in the gulf and Caribbean, it seems like the only option for me if I want a tide watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunh</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-214491</link>
		<dc:creator>nunh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-214491</guid>
		<description>I do like the Nixon styles - interesting and refreshing but, affordable yet I believe they are overpriced (what isn&#039;t overpriced?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like the Nixon styles &#8211; interesting and refreshing but, affordable yet I believe they are overpriced (what isn&#8217;t overpriced?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overload in CO</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-203222</link>
		<dc:creator>Overload in CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-203222</guid>
		<description>Casio GW400J.  All the features you&#039;d expect from a G-shock, plus it has a vibrating option for the alarms (including countdown) which I love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casio GW400J.  All the features you&#8217;d expect from a G-shock, plus it has a vibrating option for the alarms (including countdown) which I love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M. Van Court</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-202965</link>
		<dc:creator>E.M. Van Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-202965</guid>
		<description>Jon Says: &quot;Nixon’s look nice but get poor reviews for durability.&quot;

I can believe that.  Nixon is better know for fashion watches than hard use watches.  I&#039;m not commited to the Nixon yet and will look at an analog tide watch soon.

I&#039;ve thought about the Freestyle you describe, but like the more graphic display better.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Says: &#8220;Nixon’s look nice but get poor reviews for durability.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can believe that.  Nixon is better know for fashion watches than hard use watches.  I&#8217;m not commited to the Nixon yet and will look at an analog tide watch soon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought about the Freestyle you describe, but like the more graphic display better.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-202940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-202940</guid>
		<description>Nixon&#039;s look nice but get poor reviews for durability.

The newer Freestyle version of the watch you have pictured is very nice--it does away with the tide graphic and has a simpler vertical marker to tell how close to high or low you are (and then has a more detailed screen for future tides).  Also, it&#039;s possible to easily change between a number of locations. I found it very useful on a recent trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nixon&#8217;s look nice but get poor reviews for durability.</p>
<p>The newer Freestyle version of the watch you have pictured is very nice&#8211;it does away with the tide graphic and has a simpler vertical marker to tell how close to high or low you are (and then has a more detailed screen for future tides).  Also, it&#8217;s possible to easily change between a number of locations. I found it very useful on a recent trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-202934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727#comment-202934</guid>
		<description>John, 
  I couldn&#039;t agree more. I came to the same conclusion about the Nixon Lodown watch when I wrote about it sometime ago: 

http://ablogtoread.com/watch-buying/simple-surfer-the-nixon-lodown-is-an-ideal-tide-watch-and-surfers-companion/

 Cool that we are on the same wavelength! Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
  I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I came to the same conclusion about the Nixon Lodown watch when I wrote about it sometime ago: </p>
<p><a href="http://ablogtoread.com/watch-buying/simple-surfer-the-nixon-lodown-is-an-ideal-tide-watch-and-surfers-companion/" rel="nofollow">http://ablogtoread.com/watch-buying/simple-surfer-the-nixon-lodown-is-an-ideal-tide-watch-and-surfers-companion/</a></p>
<p> Cool that we are on the same wavelength! Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

