<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garmin Fortrex 401/301 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/06/17/garmin-fortrex-401301-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/06/17/garmin-fortrex-401301-released/</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/06/17/garmin-fortrex-401301-released/comment-page-1/#comment-231936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1751#comment-231936</guid>
		<description>This looks pretty cool, I&#039;m going to look more into this cos never heard of it before.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks pretty cool, I&#8217;m going to look more into this cos never heard of it before.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/06/17/garmin-fortrex-401301-released/comment-page-1/#comment-225562</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1751#comment-225562</guid>
		<description>The 101 and 201 have been out for some years, but are showing their age (serial data ports and a slightly larger case and less battery duration).  My 101 is very waterproof and very useful.  The 301 claims a better reciever - we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 101 and 201 have been out for some years, but are showing their age (serial data ports and a slightly larger case and less battery duration).  My 101 is very waterproof and very useful.  The 301 claims a better reciever &#8211; we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overload in CO</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/06/17/garmin-fortrex-401301-released/comment-page-1/#comment-217363</link>
		<dc:creator>Overload in CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1751#comment-217363</guid>
		<description>I just checked out their site.  There&#039;s also a 101 and 201 that are out now.  The 301 and 401 are slated to release fall 09.  The reason I wanted to go there was to check battery life.  As a smaller unit, I&#039;d expect an shortcoming would be batteries.  15-18hrs is all that&#039;s listed for these four.
Compared to the equal ($249.99) eTrex, the Legend HCx,
the eTrex series isn&#039;t much bigger (401= 2.9&quot;x1.7&quot;) (Legend=4.2&quot;x2.2&quot;) or weigh much more (401=3.1oz, Legend=5.5oz).  However, the Legend has color, 25hr battery life, mapping and maps.
I bought a nylon wrist carrier for my eTrex, as I didn&#039;t like it bobbing around on it&#039;s neck lanyard.

I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s any technology in it that makes reception better on the Fortrex.  I doubt I&#039;ll look at it when it comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked out their site.  There&#8217;s also a 101 and 201 that are out now.  The 301 and 401 are slated to release fall 09.  The reason I wanted to go there was to check battery life.  As a smaller unit, I&#8217;d expect an shortcoming would be batteries.  15-18hrs is all that&#8217;s listed for these four.<br />
Compared to the equal ($249.99) eTrex, the Legend HCx,<br />
the eTrex series isn&#8217;t much bigger (401= 2.9&#8243;x1.7&#8243;) (Legend=4.2&#8243;x2.2&#8243;) or weigh much more (401=3.1oz, Legend=5.5oz).  However, the Legend has color, 25hr battery life, mapping and maps.<br />
I bought a nylon wrist carrier for my eTrex, as I didn&#8217;t like it bobbing around on it&#8217;s neck lanyard.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s any technology in it that makes reception better on the Fortrex.  I doubt I&#8217;ll look at it when it comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
