<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WristWatchReview.com &#187; Essays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/category/essays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Nivarox, The Most Important Company You&#8217;ve Never Heard Of</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/12/06/inside-nivarox-the-most-important-company-youve-never-heard-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/12/06/inside-nivarox-the-most-important-company-youve-never-heard-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nivarox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=4661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the strange, small world of watchmaking, there&#8217;s lots of money to be made on items that we would call, at best, totemic. To make those items, you still need small mechanical parts. That&#8217;s where Nivarox comes in. UPDATE &#8211; Just realized Patrick already wrote his, but I&#8217;ll leave this up for Twitter folks. Also, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Finside-nivarox-the-most-important-company-youve-never-heard-of%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2011%2F12%2F06%2Finside-nivarox-the-most-important-company-youve-never-heard-of%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/nivarox-parts-3.jpeg"><img src="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/nivarox-parts-3.jpeg" alt="" title="nivarox-parts-3" width="600" height="100" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4662" /></a></p>
<p>In the strange, small world of watchmaking, there&#8217;s lots of money to be made on items that we would call, at best, totemic. To make those items, you still need small mechanical parts. That&#8217;s where Nivarox comes in.</p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; Just realized Patrick already wrote his, but I&#8217;ll leave this up for Twitter folks. Also, Patrick: Double-post! JINX!<br />
<span id="more-4661"></span><br />
Nivarox makes balance springs. The name stands for &#8220;ni variable, ni oxydable,&#8221; which translates to &#8220;neither variable nor oxidable.&#8221; These tiny springs swing the balance wheel in almost every mechanical watch and the goal of invariability coupled quality metals made Nivarox one of the most important companies in the world during the 20th century. Now they&#8217;re owned by the Swatch Group, a company that has a virtual monopoly on the high-end watch market. And, interestingly, most competitors are just fine with that.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.ablogtoread.com/inside-nivarox-the-heart-of-the-swiss-watch-industry/">Ariel Adams at ABlogToRead</a> went to visit the factory where he saw how the smallest widget can make or break a mechanical watch.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t always thus. In the 1980s, Nivarox almost dissappeared. Ariel writes:</p>
<div style="margin-left:30px;margin-right:30px;padding-left:15px;border-left:3px solid #ccc;font-style:italic;">Listening to watch industry insiders who lived through this era in the 1980s is interesting. The tale they share is akin to retelling the story of apocalypse. For them a foreign terror and technology came in to wipe out an industry they held so dear, that held so many people together in the watch manufacturing hubs of Switzerland. Nivarox was about to be the heart of a dying creature. In 1983 the various arms of Nivarox consolidated and later in 1985 it became part of the Swatch Group that was at first a merger of the ASUAG and the SSIH. Many people of course know that the Swatch Group was started by Nicolas Hayek (who recently passed away). Many people credit him for saving the Swiss watch industry.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve noticed I keep referring to the fact that the Swiss watch industry is kept together by a series of suppliers who produce the necessary parts that go into watch movement. There are zero totally vertically integrated watch makers in Switzerland even today. The whole system of manufacturing could be halted if just one supplier stopped supplying materials or parts. This is why Mr. Hayek instructed Nivarox to produce its own metal for the balance springs. Originally sourced from a metal producer in Germany, there was just too much fear that if the supplier didn&#8217;t want Nivarox as a client anymore (which of course could happen on a whim), the entire industry would supper as watches could not be produced. Hayek&#8217;s ongoing mantra to Nivarox was &#8220;product, product, product, product.&#8221;</p></div>
<p>Read the <a HREF="http://www.ablogtoread.com//">full article</a> if you want to learn about one of the most important mechanical manufacturers in the world and how so much of the watch industry depends on one invariable hairspring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/12/06/inside-nivarox-the-most-important-company-youve-never-heard-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WristWatchReview Is Seven Years Old</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/11/28/wristwatchreview-is-seven-years-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/11/28/wristwatchreview-is-seven-years-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=4522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just poking around when I noticed that WWR was born in June, 2006 and, having missed the big day, I thought I&#8217;d celebrate now. It&#8217;s been a long couple of years, many of them dry and desiccated thanks to my many intervening gigs including EIC of Gizmodo and now TechCrunch. But I founded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2011%2F11%2F28%2Fwristwatchreview-is-seven-years-old%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2011%2F11%2F28%2Fwristwatchreview-is-seven-years-old%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/happy.jpg"><img src="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/happy.jpg" alt="" title="happy" width="355" height="320" class="alignright size-full wp-image-4523" /></a>I was just poking around when I noticed that <a HREF="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2004/06/29/welcome-to-wristwatchreviewcom/">WWR was born in June, 2006</a> and, having missed the big day, I thought I&#8217;d celebrate now. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a long couple of years, many of them dry and desiccated thanks to my many intervening gigs including EIC of Gizmodo and now TechCrunch. But I founded this site to learn more about watches and now, it seems, that I&#8217;ve gotten my money&#8217;s worth. I&#8217;ve written nearly a thousand posts on this site and also written 100,000 words on watches for other sources. I&#8217;ve also recently started working with <a HREF="http://www.ablogtoread.com//">Ariel Adams</a> and we&#8217;re already at episode <a HREF="http://hourtimeshow.com/">86 of the Hourtime Show</a>. Pretty nuts.<br />
<span id="more-4522"></span><br />
Thankfully I have a great co-writer now, Patrick, who is far too accepting of the difficult and unrewarding position he recently accepted by writing with me, and thankfully I have you guys, who have read this site even when it was updated less frequently than a Geocities page.</p>
<p>Thanks for your patronage and here&#8217;s to another seven years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2011/11/28/wristwatchreview-is-seven-years-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hunting For A Tide Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E.M. Van Court</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?p=1727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently developed a burning need for a watch that displays tides. No, not the University of Alabama Crimson Tides, the ocean&#8217;s tides. High tide, low tide, slack tide, whether the tide is coming in or going out have much more import for me than ever before. This calls for a new watch. I&#8217;m assessing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2009%2F05%2F21%2Fhunting-for-a-tide-watch%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2009%2F05%2F21%2Fhunting-for-a-tide-watch%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/nixon-lodown-ti.jpg" alt="Nixon Lodown Titanium" title="nixon-lodown-ti" width="285" height="429" class="right" /></p>
<p>I recently developed a burning need for a watch that displays tides.  No, not the University of Alabama Crimson Tides, the ocean&#8217;s tides.  High tide, low tide, slack tide, whether the tide is coming in or going out have much more import for me than ever before.</p>
<p>This calls for a new watch.<br />
<span id="more-1727"></span><br />
I&#8217;m assessing my options, but I have more than I thought I would.  As much as I would like a mechanical watch with a tide feature, it is out of my reach for the moment, but quartz has me spoiled for choices.  Rip Curl, Nixon, Vestal, Reactor, Quicksilver, Freestyle, Oceanus, Casio, and Timex all have watches with a tide feature.  Casio has several digital options with displays that are easy to read, but the Freestyle Mega Tide makes it clear that the designers knew that what the tide is doing is more important than the time of day.  The Rip Curl Titanium Tidemaster looks the premier analog tide watch.  The Oceanus loses out on this because the tide display is nowhere near as readable as the Ripcurl&#8217;s and doesn&#8217;t show spring and neap tides.  The Reactor Graviton has an analog display over an LCD that has a graphic tide chart, in the customary Reactor steel ingot style.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nixonnow.com/">Nixon Lodown Ti </a>is a contender in the digital category.  This one has a clear tide display, showing where the tide is now and where it will be over the rest of the day.  It is programmed with tide data for 200 beaches for 15 years.  It is digital, so styling is a secondary concern, but the case and strap are fairly sleek, without protrusions to get caught on things.  In addition to the tide display, it has all the usual bells and whistles of a digital watch; alarms, timer, backlight, and second time zone.  I usually think of Nixon as a fashion watch, so I am concerned about durability, but it is rated for 100m water resistance.  Pretty good option for $90.</p>
<p>Coming soon; Part II, Analogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2009/05/21/hunting-for-a-tide-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Velociphile says &#8220;Horology is Dead&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/03/01/velociphile-says-horology-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/03/01/velociphile-says-horology-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/03/01/velociphile-says-horology-is-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll comment on this shortly, but I want to put this up before I forget about it. Horology, which has become reduced to a market serving platitude. With popularity, watches have become predictable, and regrettable. Horology&#8217;s fundamental ideals are compromised for the market, lost in plain sight, leaving only the impurities precipitated from it. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2008%2F03%2F01%2Fvelociphile-says-horology-is-dead%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2008%2F03%2F01%2Fvelociphile-says-horology-is-dead%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/5904_logo.jpg' alt='5904_logo.jpg' class="center" /><br />
I&#8217;ll comment on this shortly, but I want to put this up before I forget about it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Horology, which has become reduced to a market serving platitude.  With popularity, watches have become predictable, and regrettable. Horology&#8217;s fundamental ideals are compromised for the market, lost in plain sight, leaving only the impurities precipitated from it. Here&#8217;s the bottom line for me: I still like watches and properly executed horology.  One generation ago the hobby didn&#8217;t even have a name.  The internet and resultant communication between like minded enthusiasts did spur the market and lead to some great new things.  It&#8217;s what came on the coattails I have a problem with. The saving grace is that the two edged sword of success gives some companies the ability to invest in true horological innovation; it&#8217;s just harder to see the wood for the trees.  </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://velociphilewatch.blogspot.com/">Velociphile&#8217;s Journey into Watches</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/03/01/velociphile-says-horology-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wow: Laptops can affect accuracy!</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/02/01/wow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/02/01/wow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/02/01/wow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[/> The little experiments and photos were taken in April 2007, and had forgotten all about it. I&#8217;m a notebook-user, and I&#8217;ve sent 2 watches for abnormal daily rate getting faster without placing my watches near mobile, speakers or even bags with the magnetic clips! There is only one thing I use daily and many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2008%2F02%2F01%2Fwow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2008%2F02%2F01%2Fwow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/scaledhome_image535686.jpg' alt='scaledhome_image535686.jpg' class="center"/>/></p>
<blockquote><p>The little experiments and photos were taken in April 2007, and had forgotten all about it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a notebook-user, and I&#8217;ve sent 2 watches for abnormal daily rate getting faster without placing my watches near mobile, speakers or even bags with the magnetic clips! </p>
<p>There is only one thing I use daily and many hours with it&#8230;.. my notebook (or laptop)!</p>
<p>Coincidentally, I was trying to find some answers and was reading Donald de Carle&#8217;s Practical Watch Repairing&#8230;and there was a chapter on magnetism ( I&#8217;ve enclose a page of it for your reference, and also for the respect of copyrights).
</p></blockquote>
<p><a HREF="http://home.watchprosite.com/show-forumpost/fi-17/pi-2415161/ti-404371/s-0/">* Magnetism, Have We Missed Out The Obvious? Laptop-Users Be Aware!</a> [WatchProSite]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2008/02/01/wow-laptops-can-affect-accuracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Equation of Time?</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/11/13/what-is-the-equation-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/11/13/what-is-the-equation-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/11/13/what-is-the-equation-of-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timezone takes a close look at cosmology and the equation of time. Take a gander so you can see what that weird complication actually does. Having put ourselves in Fred Flintstone’s shoes (or saber-toothed tiger loafers, as the case may be), we can see that one fact must have seemed obvious to our flea-bitten ancestors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F11%2F13%2Fwhat-is-the-equation-of-time%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F11%2F13%2Fwhat-is-the-equation-of-time%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/equation2.thumbnail.gif' alt='equation2.gif' class="left"/><br />
Timezone takes a close look at cosmology and the equation of time. Take a gander so you can see what that weird complication actually does.</p>
<blockquote><p>Having put ourselves in Fred Flintstone’s shoes (or saber-toothed tiger loafers, as the case may be), we can see that one fact must have seemed obvious to our flea-bitten ancestors — looking up at the sky, day or night, the natural conclusion to draw is that the earth is stationary, with heavenlybodies moving around it.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.timezone.com/extras/200711101492">Cosmology and the Equation of Time &#8211; TimeZone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/11/13/what-is-the-equation-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Watchmakers Doomed?</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/19/are-watchmakers-doomed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/19/are-watchmakers-doomed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/19/are-watchmakers-doomed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nice thread about the creation of movements and the death of watchmaking. Among many other speculative reasons, my friend and recognized world wide authority in the world of fine timepieces, proposed an idea I had heard before, whispered between old timers for years, in this niche, curtained world of magic and mythology that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F19%2Fare-watchmakers-doomed%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F19%2Fare-watchmakers-doomed%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/watchmaker.jpg' alt='watchmaker.jpg' class="right"/>A nice thread about the creation of movements and the death of watchmaking.</p>
<blockquote><p>Among many other speculative reasons, my friend and recognized world wide authority in the world of fine timepieces, proposed an idea I had heard before, whispered between old timers for years, in this niche, curtained world of magic and mythology that is Haute Horlogerie &#8211; &#8220;modern movements are designed on, by, and for computers and automated production, and thus, leave no room for the world of true skilled manual watchmaking. The world where an experienced, gifted watchmaker adjusts, files, polishes, tunes, something that was conceived with more &#8216;human, real world&#8217; tolerances.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.network54.com/Forum/169624/message/1173635837/I+had+an+interesting+conversation+with+an+industry+old+timer+recently">Industry Old Timer</a> [WatchRap]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/19/are-watchmakers-doomed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Just Not Into You&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/im-just-not-into-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/im-just-not-into-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/im-just-not-into-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One man, one watch, and the age-old question: do I really need another watch? Back to the question. Is it ok if you dont like a watch which you blindly got, without seeing it in person. How to avoid it in the future???? What do you guys look for when u buy a watch you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F06%2Fim-just-not-into-you%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F06%2Fim-just-not-into-you%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/00055673detaila.jpg' alt='00055673detaila.jpg' class="left"/><br />
One man, one watch, and the age-old question: do I really need another watch?</p>
<blockquote><p>Back to the question. Is it ok if you dont like a watch which you blindly got, without seeing it in person. How to avoid it in the future???? What do you guys look for when u buy a watch you never seen in your life? </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.pmwf.com/cgi-bin/Forum/webbbs_config.cgi?read=1183822">Is it ok if&#8230; you dont like a watch</a> [PMWF]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/im-just-not-into-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Among the Watchmakers</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/among-the-watchmakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/among-the-watchmakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/among-the-watchmakers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great photo reportage on a German watchmaker in his little studio plus some amazing watch shots. When visiting german watchmaker Christian Klings recently I felt reminded of this old term, not only because his tiny workshop, also on the top floor under the roof exactly meets this descriptions; also his style of watchmaking comes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F06%2Famong-the-watchmakers%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F03%2F06%2Famong-the-watchmakers%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/chkl_06_l.jpg' alt='chkl_06_l.jpg' class="center"/></p>
<p>A great photo reportage on a German watchmaker in his little studio plus some amazing watch shots.</p>
<blockquote><p>
When visiting german watchmaker  Christian Klings recently I felt reminded of this old  term, not only because his tiny workshop, also on the top floor under the roof exactly meets this descriptions; also his style of watchmaking comes very, very close. Few has been written about Christian Klings and different from the few &#8220;stars&#8221;  among the AHCI his name isnt that well known even among those, more focused on the world of independents.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.watchprosite.com/show-forumpostf.classic/fi-16/pi-2164217/ti-338642/s-0/">The german &#8220;cabinotier&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;. &#8211; </a> [www.watchprosite.com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/03/06/among-the-watchmakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balance-cocks Wha?</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/12/20/balance-cocks-wha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/12/20/balance-cocks-wha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/12/20/balance-cocks-wha/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Balance cocks are the little pices that fit over the balance wheel to keep them in place. They sometimes look like little chickens, or coqs, and have absolutely nothing to do with what&#8217;s going through your filthy dirty mind. Fascination has a huge article on the them, explaining that they were once so beautiful people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2006%2F12%2F20%2Fbalance-cocks-wha%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2006%2F12%2F20%2Fbalance-cocks-wha%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img id="image913" src="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/coq-3.jpg" alt="coq-3.jpg" class="left"/>Balance cocks are the little pices that fit over the balance wheel to keep them in place. They sometimes look like little chickens, or coqs, and have absolutely nothing to do with what&#8217;s going through your filthy dirty mind. Fascination has a huge article on the them, explaining that they were once so beautiful people actually wore them as jewelry. Stupid people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.faszination.ch/coqs_e.htm">Balance-cocks and watch keys</a> [fascination]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2006/12/20/balance-cocks-wha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

