<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WristWatchReview.com &#187; Swiss Army</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/category/reviews/swiss-army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.wristwatchreview.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Which Sub-$500 Chrono?</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/31/which-sub-500-chrono/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/31/which-sub-500-chrono/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Army]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/31/which-sub-500-chrono/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great thread over at WuS about sub-$500 chronos. I second the notion that the Swiss Army chronos are killer and very inexpensive. Hamilton should be down in the $500 range as well. There are some Swiss Army 9G 600 Chronograph going on ebay now for $450, they have the valjoux 7750 movement. You don&#8217;t often [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F01%2F31%2Fwhich-sub-500-chrono%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F01%2F31%2Fwhich-sub-500-chrono%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="/GiftGuide/PostLinks/Amazon/SwissArmy/Swiss-Army.php" title="View product details at Amazon"><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000A7G4R6.01-A2FZRUU7GAANGP._SCMZZZZZZZ_V1121032785_.jpg" alt="Swiss Army Chrono Auitomatic FA18 24464 Mens Watch" class="left" /></a>Great thread over at WuS about sub-$500 chronos. I second the notion that the <a HREF="http://www.timetechtalk.com/view_topic.php?id=1812&#038;forum_id=4&#038;jump_to=10945">Swiss Army chronos</a> are killer and very inexpensive. Hamilton should be down in the $500 range as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>There are some Swiss Army 9G 600 Chronograph going on ebay now for $450, they have the valjoux 7750 movement. You don&#8217;t often see that caliber movement at that low price. There is a massive thread in the affordable forum here talking about them. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=46739">Which chrono watch under 500$ &#8211; Watchuseek Watch Forums</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/31/which-sub-500-chrono/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss Army Watches: They&#8217;re Getting Better</title>
		<link>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Army]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Detailed discussion of Swiss Army Watches over at WuS. I&#8217;ve actually been quite impressed with some of them, especially their newer mechanical line. What&#8217;s your experience been? Good value for the money and they have gotten serious. They have been selling mechanical watches for some time and have a three year warranty. Opinion &#8212; Swiss [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F01%2F23%2Fswiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wristwatchreview.com%2F2007%2F01%2F23%2Fswiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better%2F&amp;source=johnbiggs&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img id="image962" src="http://www.wristwatchreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/swiss-army-ant.jpg" alt="swiss-army-ant.jpg" class="left"/><br />
Detailed discussion of Swiss Army Watches over at WuS. I&#8217;ve actually been quite impressed with some of them, especially their newer mechanical line. What&#8217;s your experience been?</p>
<blockquote><p>Good value for the money and they have gotten serious. They have<br />
been selling mechanical watches for some time and have a three year<br />
warranty.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=46443">Opinion &#8212; Swiss Army Watches &#8211; Watchuseek Watch Forums</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wristwatchreview.com/2007/01/23/swiss-army-watches-theyre-getting-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

