Home Continuing Series Historical Horology Historical Horology: Changing Cars and Stable Watches

Historical Horology: Changing Cars and Stable Watches

701
3

 

59-Caddy-and-Rolex-Datejust

 

Huh, go and figure – yet another “cars are like watches” post from me on the weekends.  Perhaps it’s just my own inclinations, or simply the publications I follow, but it’s hard to escape the automobile and wrist watch parallels once you’ve spent some time down in the details of this obsession.

Rolex-Datejust-Two-Tone
This latest writeup (over at aBlogtoWatch) I’ve found comes from Richard Paige (you remember our review of his Wrocket, right?) where he starts off with two quintessential luxury brands – Cadillac and Rolex.  Paige starts off back in the 50’s, where we have one of the famous finned (and, in this case, pink) Cadillacs from 1959.  Paired to it, he has the 1960’s Rolex two-tone Datejust.
68-Caddy-and-Rolex-Datejust

As he goes through some leaps in the models years (to ’62, then ’68, ’74, ’80 and so on, up to modern day), one thing remains unchanged – the Rolex Datejust.  His premise is that while the auto companies change their lineups and designs over time, watch brands have a tendency to rest on their laurels (or, if you prefer, continue to champion a proven and popular design).  While it’s not precisely an exact pairing of watch to car, it’s a pairing of luxury to luxury (save the snide remarks – as someone who calls Detroit home, I still view a Caddy as a luxury car).

2013-Caddy-and-Rolex-Datejust

While the Datejust isn’t the Rolex that I would personally buy myself, it does carry a sort of timeless feel to it – the design doesn’t necessarily feel out of date, or something that came from another decade (even though it quite honestly did).  While we often look to what the latest and greatest is (and we watch writers fall victim to that same bug), it is worthwhile to reference what can truly be called classic designs, and see how they still work well for us today.

2010-Caddy-and-Rolex-Datejust
All images courtesy of aBlogtoWatch

Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.

We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team

3 COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.