Home Continuing Series Historical Horology Historical Horology: Non-mechanical Speedmasters from Omega

Historical Horology: Non-mechanical Speedmasters from Omega

444
0

 Speedsonic_electric-watches.co_.uk_

When it comes to Omega, many folks instantly think of one model – the Speedmaster. This is a fair leap to make, given how iconic the watch has become. Variations have come and gone, but the one you’re likely picturing in your mind right now is a mechanical chronograph with a black dial. A lot of that is fueled from what we see today, as well as the vintage models that are currently popular. In the 1970’s, however, Omega was by no means immune to the quartz crisis.

They were certainly in a state where they need to adapt their wares to meet where demand was heading, so that’s what they did. In the mid-70s, they released a Speedmaster series called the Speedsonic (interestingly enough, they also carried Seamaster casebacks due to their WR rating), powered by a 300Hz tuning-fork movement (ala what Bulova was doing).

2LCD-1620speedies_tz-uk.com_SIMONH

A few years down the line, and we start seeing quartz-powered watches with digital displays popping up under the Speedmaster name. These 1977 models were only produced for a year, and are generally not run across too often (in fact, if you did come across one, I’d venture to guess you think it was some cheap knockoff, given it’s styling).

x-33_Z-33

There were other models in the intervening years, but the digital look has persisted, even to this day with the X-33 watch (and it’s successor, the Z-33). This certainly doesn’t look like something you’d find at the drugstore, but it also doesn’t look quite like the Speedmaster you’d think of.  While they may not appeal to the Speedmaster purist, there can be a certain charm to them.  And who knows, with this bit of information, you may run across a bargain one day at the flea market!

Omega-Spacemaster-Z-33-persp

If you want to read up some more on this particular topic, check out the excellent article from Worn & Wound (which is also where the images for this post came from).

Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.

We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.