All the way back in April, we brought you word of a new collection from Christopher Ward, the C63 Sealander. In that article, we covered the three different models that comprise the collection. Since that time, we’ve been spending time with my personal favorite from the collection, the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT.
Why a GMT? Well, for me, it’s no so much about travel any more, as I don’t do that near as much as I used to. I still have a practical use for it. At work, our servers record events in terms of UTC, so I’m able to set the second time zone to that, and easily track the offset of what I see in the logs. Even past that, there’s another really nice use. If you’re the sort that tends to swap around watches, you might run down the movement (even one with the 56-hour power reserve like this watch has). With that, the GMT hand gives you a quick idea of where in the 24-hour day you are, so you know how much adjusting you’re doing to get to the current date and time.
So, whatever the usage, a GMT complication can be helpful. For me, everything else being equal, if I could have the same watch in a three-hander or in a GMT (such as you can have in this C63 Sealander collection), I’m opting for the GMT version. That’s also why the two watches of my own that I wear the most have a GMT complication. I just plain like it. From all of that (and reviewing others), I know what I like in a GMT watch, and I found a lot to like in the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT.
Now, let’s just address the concerns of the GMT purists. This needs to be called out because the GMT hand, while you can adjust it independently, it’s tied to the hour hand. In a “true” GMT watch, you instead adjust the hour hand independently (in one-hour increments). That makes sense. If you have the GMT hand set to UTC (or your home time zone), and you land somewhere else, you can quickly adjust your hour hand to the local time and off you go. If you’re a major traveller, then that sort of approach would make the most sense. For someone like me, however, I’m ok with the approach that CW used here (and I see most commonly) – though, if future iterations switched to that type of adjustment, I’d definitely be on board.
That’s a fairly minor quibble with the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT, and as I said, not one that I particularly care about. It could be a deciding factor (for me) between two watches, but realistically either way is going to get me the look and functionality I like. One other minor nit I had to pick with the watch was it’s height in relation to it’s diameter. Now, under 12mm is a thin watch, don’t get me wrong. Set as it is against the 39mm diameter, it can look a touch thicker than the dimensions would suggest. This was more of a “just out of the box” impression, and once I was wearing it, it became less of a concern. And in talking with my WWR colleagues, it’s about as thin as it could be to package the movement and handset without other major rearchitecting, so we’re getting about the best we can in terms of dimensions.
For me, that 39mm diameter on the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT is the main dimension that really sold me on the watch. My other GMTs that I regularly wear are 41mm and 42mm. Not a huge difference as measurements go, but the 39mm really looks – and wears – noticeably smaller on the wrist. Not so small you feel like it’s disappearing, but it’s just something that you say “yeah, that’s different, and it’s nicely sized”. In other words, it’s big enough to allow the watch to do it’s job, without overwhelming your wrist.
This is, I believe, due to the fact that the view you get of the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT is mostly dial. Sure, it’s got the 24-hour fixed bezel, but you don’t see any other case protruding past it other than the lugs. This allows your eyes to focus in on the dial. On our reviewer, we had the black dial come in. I was concerned at first about reflections off of that glossy dial, but it was really no worse than any reflections you’d get off of the sapphire crystal. That was good, then, as it provided a very crisp contrast to the white applied indices on the dial, and the polished (and luminous paint-filled) hands. That’s why black dials with white indices are so popular – they’re just ultra legible.
They also reduced other noise on the dial of the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT. Yes, the brand name is there, but it’s not overly-pronounced. Then, the printing on the lower portion of the dial is smaller yet. It’s there to give you the information you might need, but it’s something that doesn’t draw your eye away from reading the time. Which, given that it’s the primary job of a watch, is a very good thing indeed.
Our reviewer came on the vintage oak camel leather strap, which has a slightly sueded texture to it. As with any strap, it was a little stiff at first, but the leather quickly broke in. The helped with the comfort, as did the slight taper from the 20mm lugs down to the buckle. With it coming with quick change spring bars, it would be a simple matter to swap in a different strap, or even the bracelet. This is a great way to refresh the look of a watch, or just do something as minor as having the strap coordinate with your belt and shoes, if you were so inclined.
For working from home and the casual summer dress code, the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT worked quite well. Sure, the glossy bits felt maybe a little bit more dressed up than the rest of me, but it worked just fine. And it also meant it still worked well when I threw on a sport coat here and there. If you were going for a black-tie affair, you’d probably want a darker leather (or the bracelet), but that just means that the watch is a bit of a chameleon, dressing up or dressing down as you need it.
As I’ve reviewed Christopher Ward watches over the past few years, I’ve had a number of different favorites. As my own tastes have adjusted, and the brand improves their watches, it’s natural to change opinions. I’ve held on to favorites for a while in my own mind, but now, it’s easy for me to say that the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT is my favorite of their range. I mean, you’re getting a competent design powered by a Swiss Sellita movement all for under a grand (on the strap), so really, what’s not to like? And if you don’t care for the GMT, you can drop to the three-hander for a few less bucks and still get the same design and a Swiss movement. All told, this new collection is top of the CW charts for me, with the Christopher Ward C63 Sealander GMT taking the number one slot. If you’re rowing my same boat, you can pick one up for yourself at a price of $950 on a strap, or $1,070 on the bracelet. christopherward.com
Details from Christopher Ward
- Diameter: 39mm
- Height: 11.85mm
- Weight: 62g
- Lug to lug: 45.80mm
- Case: Steel
- Crystal: Sapphire
- Dial colour: Black or White
- Depth rating: 15 ATM
- Movement: Sellita SW330-2 with Elaboré ‘Colimaçoné’ finish
- Functions: Hour, minute, central seconds, date, GMT
- Power reserve: 50-56 hours
- Vibrations: 4hz / 28,800 vibrations per hour
- Timing tolerance: +20/-20 seconds per day
- Strap width: 20mm
- Swiss made
- Self-winding 25 jewel mechanical movement
- Up to 56-hour power reserve Formulation not consistent with the Elite
- GMT complication
- Date calendar
- Central hacking seconds hand
- Antishock system
- Twin-flag engraving over ‘Colimaçoné’ finish on the rotor
- Elaboré ‘Colimaçoné’ finish on the movement
- Polished lacquer dial
- Super-LumiNova Grade® X1 BL C1 hands, indexes
- Top-brushed indexes with diamond polished facets
- Brushed and polished hands
- Signature Trident counter-balance on seconds hand
- Brushed and polished marine-grade stainless steel case
- Circular brushed and polished fixed steel bezel with black lacquer filling
- Anti-reflective sapphire crystal
- Screwdown, display caseback
- Embossed screw-down crown
- 150m water resistance
- Unique engraved serial number
- Strap options – Bracelet, Hybrid black/ orange, Hybrid black, #tide ocean material® black/ orange, Vintage oak camel or Vintage oak black
Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.
We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The WWR Team