Home Reviews REVIEW: South Lane Signature Watch

REVIEW: South Lane Signature Watch

967
3

 

Strap changes are one of the easiest ways to change the character of a watch, and no strap is easier to swap out than the nylon NATO straps that are available all over the place.  Recently, I came across a Swedish brand that has embraced that flexible strap.

The company, South Lane, was founded in 2011, and they’re focused on creating minimalistic designs in Stockholm.  If you head to their watch page, at first it looks like they’ve got eight models on offer.  In reality, it’s a single watch, available on a variety of straps.

The watch itself is fairly clean – a thin steel case (40mm wide) with minimal bezel; under the crystal you’ve got a black dial, chrome numerals, and chrome hands.  With the compact size, and monochrome color pallete, this watch is ready to be a chameleon.

To help in that regard, they’ve got eight different straps available, each representing different design capitals (so yes, you’re not imagining things – some of those straps are reminiscent of flag colors).  These are all in a standard 20mm width; length is, I’d say, average (260mm = 10.2″).  On my 7.25″ wrist, I really didn’t have enough left over to tuck the strap back in to the last ring – so I left it loose.

See the lines in the film?

In terms of daily wear, I was anticipating this watch to be harder to read than it was.  Really no issues with excessive glare, or losing the hands in the black dial.  I was disappointed, however, in what appears to be a film/dirt under the crystal.  At first I thought that I needed to wipe things down, but quickly realized it wasn’t the top that had the issue.

Given the strap and smaller case, it should be no surprise that this is a very light watch.  The downside of a smaller/thinner case, on a quartz watch, is that you’re very likely to hear the movement.  It’s not as loud as some I’ve run across, but you’ll definitely hear this in a quiet room (I’l leave it to you if that’s a good or bad thing).

Now, in terms of pricing, these are truly on the high side.  AT $149 for the watch, and $29 for each additional strap, you’re going to want to be sure that this is a design you’re in love with (I do like the clean lines).  Past that, you’ll probably want to get some additional straps to make this more versatile – but that makes for a rather expensive package for a simple three-hander.

For me, while the watch looks nice, it’s too highly priced, at least for what the American markets I think are used to.  Add in the dirty crystal on the watch, and I’m less enamored with the piece (that said, it could be we were sent a factory “second” for the review; customers I would be could exchange for a clean example).

As with everything, it’s all in the eye of the (watch) beholder though.  If you want to add one to your collection, head on over here.

 

Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.

We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team

3 COMMENTS

  1. I had a disgusting experience with South Lane a year ago. It took 4 months for a watch retailed at £33 ($50 ish) and when I received it, it disintegrated in my hand.

    It was extremely cheaply made, and after contact with south lane, which was a teenager operating out of his bedroom. (I know this as I was so fustrated I did some research), I three the watch in the bin.

    I had waited four months to get my watch and had it in my hand for 30 seconds before I threw it away. No exaggeration.

    I would advise anyone to stay away from south lane as these are clearly straight out of a factory in china. They are more served for Christmas crackers than actual watches.

  2. I had a disgusting experience with South Lane a year ago. It took 4 months for a watch retailed at £33 ($50 ish) and when I received it, it disintegrated in my hand.

    It was extremely cheaply made, and after contact with south lane, which was a teenager operating out of his bedroom. (I know this as I was so fustrated I did some research), I threw the watch in the bin.
    I had waited four months to get my watch and had it in my hand for 30 seconds before I threw it away. No exaggeration.

    I would advise anyone to stay away from south lane as these are clearly straight out of a factory in china. They are more served for Christmas crackers than actual watches.

Leave a Reply to Jeff Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.