Home Reviews REVIEW: Wenger Squadron Chronograph (Part 2)

REVIEW: Wenger Squadron Chronograph (Part 2)



Yesterday, we started our tour around the Wenger Squadron Chronograph, the first Swiss Army piece we’ve done a hands-on review with here at WWR.  Today, we’ll wrap up our review of the piece.

As I mentioned near the end of yesterday’s writeup, this is a relatively thin and light watch.  Combined with the rubber (not resin) strap, this makes for a very comfortably-wearing piece.  In terms of using it, the face (even with the skeleton hands) is very readable, day or night, and the chrono functions work as expected.

You’ll also notice that the start-stop pusher has a red ring on it to set it apart.  Not a necessary detail for anyone remotely familiar with a chrono, but a nice design detail.  Another interesting design detail comes into play with the uni-directional bezel.  If you look closely, you’ll see that there’s actually an arrow indicating the direction of rotation.  Again, not something necessary, but still a nice touch (also?  The lume pip was outstanding).

Now, there were some design elements that I wasn’t as fond of.  You’ll notice that the chrono registers are encircled, whereas the sub-seconds dial is just “there”.  This leads to a bit of an unbalanced feel.  This off-kilter feeling continues on with the numerals that are actually displayed on the dial.

It’s not the normal 12 and 6, or 12-3-6-9 that we’re used to seeing when you don’t have the full set.  To some, this might be of visual interest, but for me, it was a bit of a distraction in the overall look and feel of the piece.

Taken as a whole, I come down on the positive side with this watch, as the overall aesthetics, fit, and design additions overcome the off-balance feeling that I picked up from some elements.  While Wenger themselves list the MSRP at $495, I was able to find some variants of this model over on Amazon for $250-$300.

And let us know – if there’s another “Swiss Army” watch you’d love us to have a look at (from Wenger, Victorinox, or someone else), post up your suggestions in the comments below.

Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.

We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team


  1. Hey there guys, thank you very much for this thorough review. Great work! May i ask, if possible, could you make a short review solely based on the watch’s capacities to withstand shock, water pressure etc. Just you know, something light but precise, i plan on buying this piece and i would put it to the test being a sportsman. Especialy interested in knowing the type of case fixation. Cheers from belgium.

Leave a Reply to Theo Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.