The key thing to remember about US trademark law is, if you don’t defend a trademark vigorously, you lose control over it. With that in mind, it’s time to play armchair lawyer (we aren’t actual lawyers) and talk about the recently filed case of Rolex Watch USA Incorporated v Vintage Watchmaker LLC. Rolex has filed suit in Arizona federal court, alleging Trademark Infringement against Vintage Watchmaker LLC and Jensen Dinh.
Jensen Dinh has run Vintage Watchmaker LLC out of Arizona, using Vietnamese suppliers to sell cases said to be the same in specifications to the original vintage Rolex watches. He also offered custom built vintage watches using original Rolex movements. The detail seems to be that the cases sold as parts bear “Rolex” engraved between the lugs, and the custom built watches bear Rolex on the dial, the Rolex crown, and the engravings on the case. All of those trademarks are indisputably Rolex Watch’s property to defend.
Rolex views Vintage Watchmaker as misleading the public, by falsely advertising the parts as Rolex parts. Rolex complains that they are not able to monitor or maintain their quality standards on parts the counterfeit products sold by Vintage Watchmaker, and which could harm their reputation. They make claims about confused consumers (trademark law places weight on the importance of avoiding confusion in the marketplace) who may have believed the parts were genuine, “causing injury to the public,” and makes a claim about harm to consumers who may have inadvertently converted an authentic watch to a counterfeit one by replacing authentic parts with parts from Vintage Watchmaker LLC. Let’s talk about that for a moment:
Rolex has a uniquely stringent view on what qualifies as an illegitimate Rolex. In their view, any modification to a watch making it appear other than it shipped from Rolex’s factory renders the whole watch counterfeit. This is their view, whether the replaced part or parts are aftermarket, or original Rolex parts. Change the bezel on DateJust from fluted gold to a Rolex stainless steel bezel? The whole watch is considered counterfeit, unless you pay a Rolex service center to change it back.
It’s unclear what impact this litigation will have on other sellers of aftermarket parts and custom watch builds, but what’s certain is that Rolex isn’t taking this lightly. They have retained 5 lawyers, both from New York and Arizona, to make their case before Judge Deborah Fine.
Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.
We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The WWR Team