Home Brands Hublot Velociphile tears into the Big Bang

Velociphile tears into the Big Bang


Velociphile is not one to mince words, but he really tears my beloved Big Bang (Hublot continues “their dull theme of apeing the Royal Oak albeit without nicely aligned bezel screws”) a new pooper. The most egregious offense? Calling a modified ETA movement an “in-house” piece.

My view is simple. The predominating IP in this design is from outside ETA/Valjoux. All the tricky side of it, the tolerancing, productionisation and so on was hard won by Valjoux a long time ago. Making it to drawing is easy peasy; simply substituting another material and upgrading with a few bushes and bits and bobs no great shakes. I have no evidence but would surmise Hublot still buy in the geartrain and possibly escapement from ETA. And, you can anglage and polish it till you can see your face think Lemania 2310 in Patek 5070 but it doesnt change its genes and the fact that Hublot had NO part in creating the base clever, super cheap and effective tractor. However, admittedly, what theyve done is at least one step – no lets be generous two steps – up from buying in a finished movement.

Velociphiles Journey into Watches

Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.

We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The WWR Team


  1. I am not sure where you get the idea that Hublot “aped” the Royal Oak. The only similarity between the two is the bezel that is screwed down with screws. The innovation in the Big Bang was the use of non-traditional watch making materials and combining them in an aesthetic fashion. I have owned a Royal Oak and own a Big Bang and from a comfort and design I much prefer the Big Bang. Combining carbon fiber, kevlar, titanium, ceramic and steel or gold in a single watch is I believe a Hublot creation. As to the movement, they are no different than many other high end watches in starting with a base ETA movement and adding to it and adding extra finishing. Soon they will have their own movement in the UNICO and this argument will be somewhat meaningless.

    Finally, using an ETA or Valjoux movement as a base has some real advantages in that they are proven and reliable movements that don’t cost an arm and a leg to repair. Having owned Pateks and having experienced repair service with Patek and the costs I can tell you that it was no more relaible but a heck of a lot more expensive to have serviced.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.