Welcome to our latest edition of Historical Horology, the series where we dive into some aspect of the history of watches and watch making. While we often hop into the wayback machine for this series, this time around we are focusing on something a bit more recent, and on a watch that many of us either currently own, or have owned in the past – the Seiko SKX779, aka the Seiko Monster.
Well, perhaps the label “Historical Horology” is a bit mis-leading, as the article I found is really more of a tear-down of the 7S26 movement. That said, it does put things into context of what the watch (and it’s movement) means. I also appreciate the fact that it calls out the movement for what it is – designed for robustness and reliability, at an affordable price point.
Rather than trying to rehash any of what the author had to say, I’m going to just send you right over to the article at ThePurists as it’s an engrossing read.
Images courtesy of ThePurists
Thank you for reading this WristWatchReview post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
WristWatchReview is one of the few remaining truly independent watch news outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent watch sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. We don't play the games the other sites play and we've paid for it when it comes to ad revenue.
We would love for you to support us on Patreon and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The WWR Team