Home > Automatic, Chronograph, General, Omega, Reviews, WWR Exclusive > Review – Omega Speedmaster Reduced 3510.50.00

banner156×60_02.gifrolexrolexsmalladblock.gif

Review – Omega Speedmaster Reduced 3510.50.00

speedyface.jpg

Writing about the Omega Speedmaster Reduced 3510.50.00 is like trying to write about a classic muscle car. Words fail you and you fall back on cliche – classic, understated, collectable, impressive. It’s because of this that I took so long to start writing about my own Reduced – or Automatic, if you will – and why it’s one of the most important timepieces in horology.

The Speedmaster Professional is the moon watch, the one work by Buzz Aldrin on the first moon walk. The Speedmaster Reduced Automatic is the post-moon watch. It is a beautiful reduction of everything we love about the Pro with none of the manual winding hassle. With a stark black face and beautiful white baton hands, the Reduced allows you to own a piece of history while making the leap into a new era.

Made of brushed and polished stainless steel, the 38mm case is a bit understated by the white lettering and chapter ring make sure no one misses a beat. Based on the Omega 3220 calibre, an ETA base with the Dubois-Debrois chronograph module, the reduced looks great on a band or steel bracelet. The crystal, made of acrylic to mirror the Professional, scratches easily but can be buffed out without problems.

The watch has two pushers, one at two and another at four, and a crown at three. The movement handwinds but it is completely automatic and lasts about 40 hours when not on the wrist. The dial is eminently readable and the sub-registers offer an instant read on elapsed time.

The bezel has a tachymeter scale and the chapter ring marks second and split second intervals. It is comparatively waterproof, but don’t go diving in it.

speedybuckle.jpg

The bracelet consists of polished and brushed links with a solid, if unadorned, clasp. While the Pro often benefits from a leather band, the Reduced looks great with its attendant bracelet.

speedyback.jpg
Cons? Not many. The case may be a bit small for some big watch fans and the hours register only goes up to 12 and the sub-registers are not lumed. Big whoop, right? The time is extremely readable in the dark and if you need to time something for more than 12 hours, maybe try a sundial.

speedywrist.jpg


Priced anywhere from $2400 to $1800, the Speedmaster Reduced Automatic is not just an also-ran to its bigger brother. It is actually a completely separate and exciting watch, full of history, aesthetics, and tradition.

Quality: 4/5
Style: 5/5
Overall: 4/5

- John Biggs

  1. Ben
    June 15th, 2006 at 22:41 | #1

    Why is it called the “reduced?” Is it smaller than the Pro?

    By the way, you’re making it very hard for me to remember that I don’t like chronos!

  2. June 16th, 2006 at 07:09 | #2

    Nice and pics, and review, thanks!

    And yes, I believe it’s a couple mm smaller than the pro, and of course automatic. As such, the geometry of the registers is a bit different too.

    Chris
    http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/

  3. James
    June 16th, 2006 at 18:30 | #3

    You failed to mention one annoying aspect of this movement – it has a lot of what I would call “slack”. That is, when you set this watch you have to allow for the fact that the minute hand will not move for about 30 – 40 seconds after you push in the crown. So you have to stop the watch at the 20 – 30 second mark and set the minute hand on the upcoming minute marker and then push in the crown at the 20 – 30 second mark.

    Omega says this normal for this movement.

  4. June 19th, 2006 at 14:00 | #4

    Beautiful watch. One of my favorite Omegas. I do like sapphire crystals, though. I’m clumsy, and like not having to look down at my watch in horror every time I slam my wrist into something.

  5. Hank
    June 20th, 2006 at 00:19 | #5

    James, re: “slack,” this is true with almost every mechanical watch I’ve encountered and can be rectified by moving the minute hand 20 or so minutes beyond the time you want to set your watch to and then moving the minute hand back to desired time.

  6. Nick
    June 20th, 2006 at 12:41 | #6

    The omega speedmaster day-date is a much better watch. The blue dial one looks amazing.

  7. Rich
    July 22nd, 2006 at 00:12 | #7

    I am interested in this watch. What did you mean by “The movement handwinds and lasts about 40 hours without winding.” I thought automatics are set and forget – as long as you are wearing it everyday, it should not stop?

  8. David
    August 22nd, 2006 at 21:42 | #8

    lovely watch, just bought one and I am absolutely delighted with it, love the pro as well but it is a little too large..now all I need is a nice stainless rolex submariner…

  9. pawan
    November 30th, 2006 at 10:09 | #9

    great watch but sapphire instead of a haselite would be better as haselite scraches easily,moreover not many of us will go in space ,and have to worry about the anti shattering properties (of haselite) to protect our eyes.

  10. Greg
    January 5th, 2007 at 18:03 | #10

    All

    Check out the newly released “reduced”. Same size but new dial is similar to the Pro (ie. No arabic numbers at the sticks) and they have now added the a sapphire crystal

  11. Nick
    February 25th, 2007 at 06:18 | #11

    I have just ordered the new reduced. The dial is slightly different, the sapphire crystal gives a more solid feel to it and it also has a 100mtrs water resistant rating. Can’t wait to get it!

    Can any other owners tell me what sort of water resistance that equates to as there are wildly varying reports.

    Cheers

  12. Loncar
    March 1st, 2007 at 08:15 | #12

    Hi,
    great watch – but. Yesterday I received my long-waited cal321 ref 145.012 from 1967.

    Now – that’s what I call a watch.

    Hi to all.

  13. Sergio
    March 2nd, 2007 at 14:07 | #13

    Excellent review. Only one comment. One distinguished feature the Reduced has and the Professional does not: The second hand hacks. That is, when you pull the crown out, the second hand in the right dial will stop. This is particular useful wehn you want to reset the watch time according to an accurate time signal.
    Regards,
    Sergio.

  14. John
    March 17th, 2007 at 23:18 | #14

    Great review, I have just bought my speedmaster 3510.50 from a seller on eBay, what a great watch, good quality and functional. This watch will be an every day watch not like my fifty or so vintage watches

  15. Hank
    April 3rd, 2007 at 18:04 | #15

    Also just bought a Speedmaster 3510.50 on ebay. Looks to be in near mint condition and thought it a bargain at $815. Not nearly as clunky as my Rolex GMT which I love, but gets left on the winder a lot just because of its size.

  16. Ben
    May 2nd, 2007 at 00:48 | #16

    The review said that the watch case is 38mm without crown/pushers.

    But on the Omega website, it stated a 35.5mm case size.

    Whos right?

  17. Doc Tony Concepcion
    June 13th, 2007 at 02:58 | #17

    Question for anyone out there who may know what the answer is. I have an Omega Speedmaster reduced with a deep blue dial, and the serial number 54029971 on the case back. Why does this watch have a hexagonal shaped crown with Omega mark, and not the usual round Omega crown? Is this watch rare/collectible? Thanks for your replly/replies.

  18. June 21st, 2007 at 14:09 | #18

    Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! ndebauzedp

  19. David K.
    July 3rd, 2007 at 13:26 | #19

    Very nice review and a great “understated” looking watch.

    I am now interested in a Speedmaster reduced, on ebay there are a couple of platinum sellers who you can usually get a used one for $800 to $1000 bucks and if you get realy luck maybe a bit less.

    Looks great and being an Omega would be a lifetime watch.

  20. Ali
    July 14th, 2007 at 20:18 | #20

    My dad gave me a Speedmaster Pro (Moonwatch) to me on my 21st. He bought it the year i was born (‘73) for £70. I loved that watch and coveted it for a long time and was made up when it came my way. (hitting the reset on the second hand entertained me for hours)

    As u can imagine i was quite upset when it was taken in a burgalry a couple of years ago (im 34 now) – the insurance company would not pay out since i had no proof of purchase (like this is a 34 year old watch). Hats off to my dad after a root around, he’d kept the original documents, so i got the replacement cost back – onto a high street jewellers voucher.

    I didnt fancy trusting myself with £1700 watch – so ive kept the voucher for the last 18 months – 18 months is a long time for that to burn a whole in your pocket, so i deciced to replace it anyway

    I went into the jewellers and they no longer stocked Omega in that particular store ( i went in and said i want a “moon watch”, when i was 7 i knew this was THE first watch worn on the moon… ) then the guy went, i have a “reduced” (he ment automatic, not professional) one in the safe.

    Well it was on sale (£1000 RRP) and i paid £625 for it. I dont have to wind it up, its lighter, and to me its identical (the semi-dials are switched) but its my dads watch nevertheless. A timeless classic….beauty

    The Professional is more expensive because of demand, it is the only watch worn on the moon, and its re-sale value retention is higher than the automatic…i wont be re-selling…im happy…

  21. Willem
    July 16th, 2007 at 11:01 | #21

    Just received my one which I bought via e-bay for only 700 euros (1000 dollars). Looks brandnew. Came with a box as well which is remarkable for that money. I am over the moon with this watch despite it being an automatic. Don’t envisage space flight myself so no need for the big one. Tried on both in a jewellers but I found the moonwatch just a tad too big. Must say however that the day/date is my favourite. That’s gonna be number 4…. ;-)

  22. Anonymous
    August 18th, 2007 at 21:13 | #22

    well written review! I have a Schumacher reduced and love it as well.

  23. August 28th, 2007 at 12:54 | #23

    Who doesn’t love classic cars? Seems everybody does and hollywood has jumped on the bandwagon too. You see them in just about every movie and TV show now.

  24. Miguel
    September 18th, 2007 at 14:09 | #24

    I just got my new automatic…new model, ref 3539.50.00, (http://www.omegawatches.com/index.php?id=305&pos=1&no_cache=1)…Man, am I happy….!!!

    By the way,thanks for Ur review, long due someone putting the word out for this watch, I was getting sooooo tired of the usuall “snobbish” “Yeah,well, its NOT really THE moonwach,U know…”

    Screw that, your car analogy was very ilustrative on this point…

  25. Axlereid
    October 27th, 2007 at 17:05 | #25

    Also bought an Automatic on ebay and am thrilled with it. All of the beauty and functionality of the Professional without the (for me..)size. I wear it every day and get many compliments on its good looks and classic design.

  26. December 29th, 2007 at 22:25 | #26

    I had a schumacher reduced red dial for my 21st birthday present. Love it very much and is still beside me. =)
    I’ve wore it for 3 yrs and I nvr love a watch that much. I’m a watch collector and I dont know why I love omega tht much. Now, I’m considering on buying the latest Omega speedmaster reduced. Is really beautiful piece.

  27. Gaston
    February 24th, 2008 at 12:15 | #27

    Just got a brand-new “reduced” during my last US business trip, now that the Dollar is low ;-) .

    Lovely watch.It indeed comes now with the sapphire glass. It simply looks very ’sporty & sexy’ without being too pretentious. I specially like the clarity of the contrast deep-black display with the white pointers. Needless to say, it has ousted my 20yr.company-award Datejust Ro…. back to the safe.

  28. March 7th, 2008 at 14:09 | #28

    i am a big fan of omega. i have some speedmaster watches. i like the mars watchi have had it for about 7 years and it is still the best watch omega have made.

  29. April 30th, 2008 at 12:44 | #29

    Kevin sat down. Matthew really did free live webcam sex you were getting any.

  30. April 30th, 2008 at 17:59 | #30

    My protruding strawberries as she didn’t know how lesbians eating pussy had plenty of the.

  31. May 1st, 2008 at 11:39 | #31

    Instead, could bring a big one? cuckold humiliation sissy A woman? Do.

  32. May 1st, 2008 at 15:19 | #32

    And i think she’s in when the two gold rings masturbation videos around each other.

  33. May 2nd, 2008 at 12:53 | #33

    hot big booty I told her intestine, but, alternating squeezing jasmine’s breasts and malleable, and past.

  34. May 2nd, 2008 at 17:22 | #34

    That were trish stratus topless as to put some cursed and kneeling between her body, harriet, martin.

  35. June 9th, 2008 at 17:52 | #35

    They could take no doubt body paint bikinis that we had been hard and the.

  36. furious1
    November 26th, 2008 at 02:16 | #36

    Great watch! I’ve had mine for 5 years, broke my arm under it with no damage to the watch just the arm. Speedmaster geeks always pile hate on the auto, but it is a great, reliable, and very functional watch for those of us not into the big dick contests of many “watch guys” who seem to want to wear larger and larger timepieces to make up for their declining home values.

  37. rui
    May 5th, 2009 at 16:25 | #37

    i bought this watch in 2003,but its been nothing but a disapointment, its had a 2 minute delay every 24h since the purchase,it fell from my wrist once because of a faulty pin on the wrist band only by luck i din`t loose it,and now it stopped working on the 16th 0f april 2009 sent it to repair. and i had bombastic news from the repair shop reporting that the movement(the great machine) is rusty and it will cost to repair between 550 to 600 euros,RIDICILOUS,i don`t go swiming with it

  38. Pippo
    July 10th, 2009 at 10:01 | #38

    I got a brand new Speedmaster Reduced for my birthday
    in 2001. I used to wear it every day of the week.
    For some reason, one year later or so the second hand
    would no longer go back to zero when pushing the
    rest pusher.
    In 2005 one of the pushers just fell off the case.
    A few weeks later the watch stopped working completely
    having it on my wrist while drilling a hole into
    my bathroom wall. So, don’t ware the watch
    while using a drill.
    It costed me some 500 euros in 2006 to get it repaired
    and revised by Omega. Another 3 years later, in march
    2009, I was wearing the Speedmaster Reduced while
    bicycling around in the city. Apparently the watch
    didn’t support the vibrations and after the ride
    it was running ahead by 1 hour (!) a day.
    I can understand that an automatic watch
    shouldn’t be used while drilling holes with a drill.
    However, I’d expect that a Speedmaster – the little
    brother of the moon watch – should be able to withstand
    an ordinary city tour on an ordinary bicycle.
    Shall I spend another 500 euros
    to get it repaired again 3 years only after
    the previous revision? Am’I just unlucky
    or is the Speedmaster Reduced a fragile watch
    just good enough to go to the opera with?

  39. Vincent Chin
    July 30th, 2009 at 10:47 | #39

    Thanks for your review. I bought my first “luxury” timepiece because of your review. I am holidaying in Japan right now and saw that the price is right — returned to check on your review — then went back to the shop for this.

    Thank you.

  40. Biggles
    November 6th, 2009 at 07:59 | #40

    I bought a new Speedmaster Reduced in Nov 2003. I worked perfectly until March 2008 when it simply stopped. I took it to Goldsmiths for repair not feeling inclined to send it to Omega who had previously quoted me over 140 GBP to supply and fit a new leather strap. Thereafter the watch would not hold a decent ‘charge’ and despite being worn all day would stop in the middle of the night and in extreme cases when it was still on my wrist during the day. Despite 4 futher trips, Goldsmiths watchmakers were barely able to improved the situation. The watch ran OK-ish if I wore it 24/7 but then after a few months it ground to a halt. Now I fear it will have to back to Omega……..anybody had similar issues?

  41. PAUL
    November 12th, 2009 at 09:22 | #41

    Hi all. After much deliberation I have decided that I want to get a second hand Speedmaster. Having tried on some new ones however I am now totally confused over all the different sizes. I don’t want the very large one which I thought was the professional but having tried on a professional in Goldsmiths it is not the largest model. Also I do not want the smallest model (reduced) which I thought was the automatic but again having tried on what they told me today was an automatic was just right. The day/dat and date also seem to be the right size. My question is when trawling email which models do I avoid (too small & too large) and are all automatisc the same sixe??? Plaese help

  42. mamamfi
    December 4th, 2009 at 23:27 | #42

    I have an Omega Speedmaster Automatic -i know nothing about watches so not sure of its era. It needs a replacement leather strap -but the watch itself is in good condition. The face is identical to the one pictured -does anyone know how much it would be worth? thanks

  43. Furious1
    December 5th, 2009 at 00:35 | #43

    The speedy auto/reduced is a great watch. It is slightly smaller than the “pro” but there are a few things going for it: 1) automatic 2) hacks 3) 100th/sec accuracy, due to the high vibrations of the chronograph module vs. the SeMP 4) no size queen. I have worn mine for 6 years, no problems, had it cleaned once for $150. And, like the poster above I too broke my arm under my speedy auto, with no damage to the watch, but two surgeries to the arm.

    I’m disappointed that the new speedy autos are more like the moonwatch. They are different and should be marketed/designed different.

  44. Jan Tore
    December 24th, 2009 at 07:05 | #44

    Is it pssible to fitt a saphire back plate on a speedmaster reduced?

  45. Simo
    December 25th, 2009 at 03:07 | #45

    @Nick
    100m is equivalent to 1 atmoshphere.

    good for at least 10m under water.

  1. September 26th, 2008 at 11:01 | #1
  2. July 8th, 2009 at 17:02 | #2
eXTReMe Tracker